https://upswingpoker.com/hand/?pokeit=124xrWtYf
on the flop cbetting could be better
on the river checking back could be better
solver says
on flop this is a 100% check back no matter the potential betsize
i could also see upsides for betting small but the solver doesnt lie : )
on turn solver says EV wise you are indifferent between calling and raising small , but 92% of the time solver calls
on the river solver says you have to bet 100% of the time with 50% potsize
again i bet too small on rivers
if i wanted to deviate from the gto solution and would choose a default river betsize of 25% (as played) than EV wise you are indifferent between checking (73% of the time) and betting (37% of the time)
i think given the effective stack on the river a 25% potsize is defensible and as you can then checking back should be the play the majority of the time
on the flop cbetting could be better
on the river checking back could be better
solver says
on flop this is a 100% check back no matter the potential betsize
i could also see upsides for betting small but the solver doesnt lie : )
on turn solver says EV wise you are indifferent between calling and raising small , but 92% of the time solver calls
on the river solver says you have to bet 100% of the time with 50% potsize
again i bet too small on rivers
if i wanted to deviate from the gto solution and would choose a default river betsize of 25% (as played) than EV wise you are indifferent between checking (73% of the time) and betting (37% of the time)
i think given the effective stack on the river a 25% potsize is defensible and as you can then checking back should be the play the majority of the time
Comment